Acer Predator XB273U vs ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN
Both are high-refresh 27" gaming monitors designed for competitive play, but they differ in panel technology and refresh rate. The XB273U offers IPS with 240Hz, while the PG27AQN features a faster 360Hz Fast IPS panel.
Acer Predator XB273U
A 27-inch IPS gaming monitor with 240Hz refresh rate, 1ms response time, and FHD resolution. Designed for competitive gamers prioritizing color accuracy and responsiveness.
Resolution
1920×1080 (FHD)
Refresh Rate
240Hz
Panel Type
IPS
Response Time
1ms
Screen Size
27 inches
Pros
- IPS panel delivers accurate, vibrant colors
- Excellent 240Hz refresh rate for smooth gameplay
- Natural ergonomic design and build quality
Cons
- Lower 1080p resolution limits detail on large screen
- Slower refresh rate than newer alternatives
- Typically higher price point than FHD competitors
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN
A 27-inch Fast IPS gaming monitor with 360Hz refresh rate, 0.03ms response time, and 1440p resolution. Built for esports and high-competitive gaming with cutting-edge specifications.
Resolution
2560×1440 (QHD)
Refresh Rate
360Hz
Panel Type
Fast IPS
Response Time
0.03ms
Screen Size
27 inches
Pros
- Industry-leading 360Hz refresh rate for ultra-smooth motion
- 1440p resolution provides sharper image detail than 1080p
- Exceptional 0.03ms response time and low input lag
Cons
- Premium price makes it cost-prohibitive for casual gamers
- Requires high-end GPU to fully utilize 360Hz at 1440p
- Overkill for most non-competitive gaming scenarios
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN wins
Superior 360Hz refresh rate, higher 1440p resolution, and industry-leading 0.03ms response time make it the more advanced choice for competitive esports players willing to pay the premium.
Acer Predator XB273U
Budget-conscious competitive gamers and FHD esports enthusiasts seeking proven 240Hz performance.
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN
Serious esports competitors and high-end gaming PC owners demanding maximum responsiveness and visual clarity.
Performance & Specifications
Refresh Rate
PG27AQN's 360Hz trounces XB273U's 240Hz for the absolute smoothest competitive gaming.
Resolution Clarity
1440p on the ASUS provides noticeably sharper visuals than 1080p on the Acer at 27 inches.
Color Accuracy
Both IPS panels deliver excellent color reproduction; the ASUS's Fast IPS maintains quality at extreme refresh rates.
Response Time
ASUS's 0.03ms is imperceptibly faster than Acer's 1ms; both are tournament-grade, but ASUS edges ahead.
Value for Money
XB273U offers strong performance at a lower price; PG27AQN demands premium spending for incremental gains.
Key Specifications Comparison
| Aspect | Acer Predator XB273U | ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27 inches | 27 inches |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 (FHD) | 2560×1440 (QHD) |
| Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 360Hz |
| Panel Technology | IPS | Fast IPS |
| Response Time | 1ms | 0.03ms |
| Price Range | $350–450 | $650–800 |
Which Monitor Is Right for You?
Choose the XB273U if you want a proven, affordable 240Hz gaming monitor that excels at competitive titles like Valorant and CS:GO without breaking the bank. Opt for the PG27AQN if you're a serious esports competitor with a high-end RTX 4090 or RX 7900 XTX capable of pushing 360Hz at 1440p, and you value every millisecond of responsiveness.
When to choose each
Choose Acer Predator XB273U if…
Budget-conscious competitive gamers and FHD esports enthusiasts seeking proven 240Hz performance.
Choose ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN if…
Serious esports competitors and high-end gaming PC owners demanding maximum responsiveness and visual clarity.
Frequently Asked Questions
The ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN edges ahead with 360Hz and 0.03ms response time, offering marginally faster motion clarity. However, the Acer's 240Hz is still tournament-viable for most esports titles if budget is a constraint.
The PG27AQN has 120Hz more refresh rate, 560p higher resolution, and significantly faster response time, but costs $200–350 more. The XB273U prioritizes affordability while delivering strong 240Hz competitive performance.
240Hz is sufficient for most players and games; 360Hz becomes noticeable only in fast-paced esports titles and requires a high-end GPU to leverage. Casual and even semi-competitive gamers rarely see proportional benefit from the upgrade.
Sources & references
Suggested sources to verify product details, pricing, reviews, and specifications.
- ReferenceAcer Predator XB273U NVbmiiprzx Review: Speedster With Accurate Colors | Tom's Hardware
The Acer Predator XB273U NVbmiiprzx gaming monitor delivers 170 Hz and G-Sync in a 1440p IPS panel. It’s <strong>highly
- ReferenceAcer Predator XB273U Gaming Monitor Review (2021) | WePC
What I will say, however, was that ... review of the Acer Predator XB273U – <strong>a high-performance gaming monitor th
- ReferenceAcer Predator XB273U F review: The very best motion clarity, full stop | PCWorld
The Acer Predator XB273U is for you. <strong>Besides the outstanding 360Hz refresh rate, it also packs excellent color p