VersusCenter
First thing
VS
Second thing

Private Internet Access vs Surfshark

Private Internet Access and Surfshark are both security-focused VPNs with strong encryption, but differ in server count, pricing structure, and feature set. PIA emphasizes simplicity and audit transparency, while Surfshark offers more simultaneous connections and advanced features at a lower annual rate.

vpnprivacyencryptionno-logssecuritycomparison

Private Internet Access

A US-based VPN service owned by Kape Technologies, known for strong encryption (AES-256), a no-logs policy independently audited, and a user-friendly interface. Offers desktop and mobile clients with customizable security settings.

Servers

~3,300 worldwide

Simultaneous Connections

10 devices

Annual Price

$39.95 (typical)

Encryption

AES-256

Headquarters

United States

Pros

  • Independently audited no-logs policy with transparent security practices
  • High-quality encryption (AES-256) and kill switch on all platforms
  • Competitive annual pricing with frequent discounts

Cons

  • Smaller server network (~35,000 IPs across ~3,300 servers) limits geographic diversity
  • Only 10 simultaneous connections per subscription
  • Slower streaming performance reported by some users due to smaller IP pool

Surfshark

A British Virgin Islands VPN with zero-knowledge architecture, unlimited simultaneous connections, and a growing server network. Known for competitive pricing, advanced features like Nexus protocol, and strong privacy policies.

Servers

3,200+ in 100 countries

Simultaneous Connections

Unlimited

Annual Price

$59.76 (2-year plan)

Encryption

ChaCha20 & AES-256

Headquarters

British Virgin Islands

Pros

  • Unlimited simultaneous connections across all devices
  • Larger server network (~3,200+ servers in 100 countries) with better geographic coverage
  • Lower annual pricing ($59.76 for 2-year plan) and more frequent promotional rates

Cons

  • Based in British Virgin Islands, not independently audited for no-logs claims as rigorously as PIA
  • Fewer advanced features for power users compared to PIA's customization options
  • Newer service with shorter track record than PIA

It's a tie

PIA edges ahead for security audits and single-user simplicity; Surfshark wins for multi-device households and value, making the choice dependent on priorities.

Private Internet Access

Security-first users who value independent audits and want a simpler, single-device or limited-connection setup.

Surfshark

Families or multi-device users who need unlimited simultaneous connections and want lower annual costs.

Security & Encryption Comparison

Private Internet AccessSurfshark

Encryption Strength

9
9

Both use military-grade encryption; PIA uses AES-256, Surfshark uses both AES-256 and ChaCha20, making them effectively equivalent.

No-Logs Auditing

10
8

PIA has undergone independent third-party audits of its no-logs policy; Surfshark claims zero-knowledge but lacks the same level of public third-party verification.

Privacy Jurisdiction

8
9

Surfshark is in British Virgin Islands (no data-sharing laws); PIA is US-based but operates independently of parent company data practices.

Kill Switch Reliability

9
9

Both offer consistent kill switch functionality across platforms with minimal leakage reports in independent testing.

Leak Prevention

9
9

Both score highly in DNS/IPv6 leak tests; minor variations depend on test conditions and user network setup.

Features & Connectivity

AspectPrivate Internet AccessSurfshark
Simultaneous Connections10 devicesUnlimited devices
Server Count~3,300 servers3,200+ servers
Countries Covered~90 countries100+ countries
Advanced ProtocolsOpenVPN, WireGuard (custom MACE DNS filtering)OpenVPN, WireGuard, Nexus (proprietary)
Split TunnelingYesYes
Ad/Malware BlockingMACE (optional)CleanWeb (included)

Pricing & Value

Private Internet Access typically costs $39.95/year on sale, while Surfshark's 2-year plan runs $59.76 (~$29.88/year). Surfshark offers unlimited simultaneous connections, which adds value for multi-device households; PIA's 10-device limit suits individual or small-group users. Long-term commitment discounts favor Surfshark, but PIA's transparency and audit track record may justify a premium for security-conscious users.

Server Network & Streaming

Both services maintain solid global server networks, but Surfshark's broader geographic footprint (100+ countries vs ~90) provides better options for accessing region-locked content. PIA's smaller IP pool can cause occasional slowdowns on streaming; Surfshark's larger pool generally supports faster, more reliable streaming without DNS detection.

Who should choose which

Security-conscious individual users
Private Internet Access — PIA's independent audit trail and transparent security practices provide the highest confidence in privacy claims.
Budget-conscious families
Surfshark — Surfshark's unlimited simultaneous connections and lower per-year cost make it ideal for households with multiple devices.
Streaming and geo-bypass users
Surfshark — Surfshark's larger server footprint and dedicated streaming features (CleanWeb) consistently outperform on streaming tasks.
Privacy advocates in US jurisdiction
Private Internet Access — PIA's third-party audits and transparent logging practices offer stronger legal and operational privacy assurance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sources & references

Suggested sources to verify product details, pricing, reviews, and specifications.

Related comparisons