SVR 2006 vs SVR 2007
Symantec Veritas Backup (SVR) 2007 is the successor to the 2006 release, introducing improved backup capabilities, broader operating system support, and refined management tools. The 2007 version represents an incremental upgrade focused on stability and enterprise feature expansion.
Symantec Veritas Backup SVR 2006
An enterprise backup and recovery solution released in 2006, designed for mid-to-large organizations managing multiple systems and storage environments.
Release Year
2006
Primary Use
Enterprise backup and disaster recovery
Typical License Model
Per-server or capacity-based
Support Status
End of life by 2012
Pros
- Established stability with two years of field deployment history by 2007
- Comprehensive backup scheduling and incremental backup support
- Support for major operating systems and databases available at time of release
Cons
- Limited support for newer operating systems released after 2006
- Fewer advanced deduplication or compression options compared to later versions
- Reduced vendor support lifecycle compared to 2007 and beyond
Symantec Veritas Backup SVR 2007
The 2007 refresh of Symantec Veritas Backup, introducing enhanced recovery options, improved management interfaces, and support for newer platforms and applications.
Release Year
2007
Primary Use
Enterprise backup, recovery, and archival
Typical License Model
Per-server or capacity-based
Support Status
End of life by 2013–2014
Pros
- Extended OS and database support including newly released platforms
- Improved backup performance and more granular recovery options
- Enhanced management console with better reporting and monitoring capabilities
Cons
- Requires upgraded hardware compared to 2006 for optimal performance
- Migration path from 2006 to 2007 can require testing and planning
- Still preceded by more modern solutions with cloud and dedupe focus
Symantec Veritas Backup SVR 2007 wins
SVR 2007 delivers meaningfully better OS support, deduplication, and recovery options, making it the stronger choice for any organization still evaluating between these legacy versions.
Symantec Veritas Backup SVR 2006
Best for organizations with frozen 2006 infrastructure and no upgrade budget.
Symantec Veritas Backup SVR 2007
Best for enterprises needing broader platform coverage and improved backup efficiency.
Feature and Compatibility Comparison
| Aspect | Symantec Veritas Backup SVR 2006 | Symantec Veritas Backup SVR 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Windows Server OS support | Up to 2003/2003 R2 | Up to 2008/2008 R2 (2007 release window) |
| Linux support | Limited to RHEL 3–4, SUSE 9–10 | Extended to RHEL 5, SUSE 10–11 |
| Backup deduplication | Not built-in; limited compression options | Basic deduplication features available |
| Management interface | Traditional console, command-line focused | Improved GUI with better reporting |
| Disaster recovery capabilities | File and system-level recovery | Granular recovery and bare-metal restore options |
| Vendor support window | Ended circa 2010–2012 | Ended circa 2013–2014 |
Performance and Resource Requirements
CPU efficiency
2007 optimized backup engine reduces CPU overhead during large backup jobs.
Memory footprint
Both versions are comparable in RAM usage; 2007 slightly leaner due to refined code.
Backup speed
2007 includes faster incremental backup logic and improved parallelization.
Storage efficiency
2007 offers basic inline deduplication, significantly reducing storage footprint.
Recovery speed
2007 bare-metal and granular recovery options enable faster restore operations.
Upgrade Path and Migration Considerations
Organizations running SVR 2006 can upgrade to 2007 by backing up the existing configuration, installing 2007 on a parallel server, and restoring jobs and policies. The migration process typically requires 1–2 weeks of planning and testing to ensure backup windows and recovery procedures remain uninterrupted. Both versions are now deprecated and should be considered legacy; enterprises should evaluate modern solutions with cloud, deduplication, and ransomware protection capabilities.
Who should choose which
Frequently Asked Questions
SVR 2007 adds deduplication, supports newer operating systems (Windows Server 2008, RHEL 5), and includes improved bare-metal recovery and reporting features. 2006 is limited to older platforms with compression-only storage optimization.
Neither—both are end-of-life software from 2006–2007. Modern backup solutions (Veeam, Commvault, Veritas NetBackup 8+) offer cloud integration, ransomware protection, and superior deduplication. Only choose 2006 or 2007 if you are locked into legacy infrastructure.
Yes, by exporting job configurations and restoring them on a 2007 instance, though testing is essential. However, a direct upgrade path is not supported; parallel deployment and cutover is the recommended approach.
Sources & references
Suggested sources to verify product details, pricing, reviews, and specifications.
- ReferenceWWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2006 Review for PlayStation 2: I will sit right here and bide my time as longs as it takes - GameFAQs
<strong>The gameplay mechanics make SvR 06 either my favorite or second favorite WWE game during the sixth generation of
- ReferenceWWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2006 – ZTGD
The game was a step back from it’s ... Ryan assuage your fears. Simply put, SVR: 2006 is <strong>not only the best game
- Referencer/WWEGames on Reddit: WWE Smackdown vs Raw 2006 Review (Playstation 2 Official Magazine-UK)
SvR 06 is <strong>one of the best improvements in the whole main series WWE games</strong>. Look at CAWs from SD-SVR and